Saturday, February 28, 2009

China tensions high after Tibet monk sets himself alight

BEIJING (AFP) — Tensions were high in a flashpoint town of southwest China Saturday after a Tibetan monk set himself on fire in protest against Chinese rule, activist groups and residents said.
Chinese authorities confirmed a man had set himself alight, but did not acknowledge claims by activist groups that police shot the monk and that he embarked on his protest after officials banned prayers at his monastery.
The incident on Friday came amid reported protests across the Tibetan plateau ahead of the ultra-sensitive 50th anniversary on March 10 of a failed uprising against Chinese rule that led to the Dalai Lama fleeing to India.
The monk, in his late 20s, was shot after dousing himself with petrol and setting himself alight in the Tibetan-populated town of Aba in southwest China's Sichuan province, the London-based group Free Tibet reported.
The monk, from Kirti monastery in Aba, held a flag with an image of the Dalai Lama, the Himalayan region's spiritual leader, as he embarked on his protest, Free Tibet and other activist groups said.
They cited unnamed witnesses and Aba residents.
In a brief report on China's official Xinhua news agency, Aba Communist Party chief Shi Jun confirmed a man wearing monk's robes had walked out of the monastery and set himself alight.
Shi reportedly said police put out the fire, and that the man was taken to hospital with burn injuries to his neck and head.
The Xinhua report made no mention of any shooting by police, while local authorities refused to comment to AFP.
Locals telephoned by AFP on Saturday were extremely fearful of discussing the issue. Some said police had fired shots but they would not comment on who these were aimed at.
One resident, who could not be named for fear of reprisal, said police had told her not to say anything but she confirmed police had fired shots.
"It's true, but I can't say anymore. My phone is monitored," she told AFP before hanging up.
Other residents also confirmed police shooting, but quickly put the phone down.
Some spoke of a strong force presence in the town after the incident.
"There are many policemen on patrol in the street and all of them have guns," an employee at a teahouse in Aba told AFP.
According to International Campaign for Tibet (ICT), the monk set himself alight after authorities blocked around 1,000 monks at Kirti monastery from holding prayers for the Tibetan New Year, which fell on Wednesday.
Aba has been a flashpoint town since police opened fire on an anti-Chinese protest there in March last year, in violence that activists said left at least seven Tibetans dead.
Tensions have been mounting for weeks across the Tibetan plateau ahead of the 1959 uprising anniversary, and Chinese authorities have reportedly dramatically increased security in the areas.
Next month also marks one year since peaceful protests that began on the 49th anniversary of the uprising escalated into violent rioting in Tibet's capital, Lhasa, and other areas of the plateau, such as Aba.
Tibet's government-in-exile says the government crackdown following last year's unrest left 200 Tibetans dead.
China denies this, but has reported police killed one "insurgent" and blamed Tibetan "rioters" for 21 deaths.
The Dalai Lama warned on Tuesday that Chinese authorities were trying to provoke Tibetans into remonstrating.
"When this happens the authorities can then indulge in (an) unprecedented and unimaginable forceful clampdown," he said.
Travel agents and other industry people have told AFP that Tibet has been closed to foreign tourists for March, although the Chinese government insists the Himalayan region remains open.
Foreign reporters are barred from travelling to Tibet independently.
China has ruled Tibet since 1951, a year after sending troops in to "liberate" the region from what it said was serfdom under the Dalai Lama.

Chinese furious over YSL sale of 'treasures'

By Jaime Florcruz
BEIJING, China (CNN) -- When Christie's announced its plans to auction off two 18th-century bronze sculptures, the Chinese flatly said "no."
At the center of the dispute are two bronze sculptures, part of the late Yves Saint Laurent's private collection of arts and antiquities. The two 18th-century pieces -- fountainheads of a rabbit and a rat -- disappeared when French and British Allied forces pillaged Beijing's Old Summer Palace during the second Opium War in 1860.
China says the relics are part of its cultural heritage and should be returned.
Christie's, saying that legal ownership of the two pieces had been "clearly confirmed," defied Chinese objections. At a three-day auction in Paris, it sold the two sculptures for euro 14 million (US$17.92 million) each to two anonymous phone bidders.
The sale of the lost treasures has whipped up nationalistic passion among Chinese in and outside China.
Luo Zhewen, chairman of the Chinese Heritage Society said, "The biggest value of the bronze heads is that they are evidence of the crime committed by imperialists who invaded China. The despicable part the auction is not that it has breached international agreements, but that it is trading criminal evidence for a massive profit."
Movie star Jackie Chan agrees.
"It has broken the hearts of the 1.3 billion people of China," he said. "All these national treasures should be returned to their home countries. In future, these fountainheads will not belong to anybody and they should all be returned to the Summer Palace."
Chan says recovering national treasures will be the subject of a film of his next year.
In a survey on Sina.com, 89% of respondents opposed the auction "because (the relics) belong to China." Only 8.5 percent found it "understandable" because the auction is "legitimate" and "China could try to buy them back with high bids."
Many reacted with raw sentiments.
"Boycott French products!" wrote a person on the discussion forum of the government-run Global Times. "As the current financial crisis goes on, we have to let the French suffer."
In another posting in China Daily's chat room, a person wrote: "In desperate times, when they are in need of money, they can sell anything regardless!"
They said the episode offered a lesson for young Chinese: "When you are weak and subdued, no matter how loud you scream, they will walk over you!" 
To many Chinese, the two bronze sculptures are painful reminders of what China-watchers call the "hundred years of humiliation syndrome," especially because the antiquities disappeared when a weak China was subjected to invasion and bullying by Western powers.
"This episode has become one of the saddest symbols of what we call 'national humiliation,'" said a history professor in Beijing.
This national humiliation syndrome at times resurfaces as a violent backlash whenever Chinese perceive a put-down of China. In 1999, for example, Chinese mobs besieged the U.S. Embassy in Beijing when U.S. missiles hit the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade and killed several Chinese staff members. Last year, some Chinese launched a campaign against the Western media in protest of what they called "negative, anti-China" reporting on the Olympic torch relay and the Tibet protests.
A debate is raging in China's mainstream media and cyberspace over China's lost treasures.
"We don't have to be so angry over losing historical relics," wrote a person in ifeng.com. "China has countless historical pieces lost overseas. We have to build many museums if we get all of them back. If we put them in foreign museums, people still can see China's ancient civilization and understand the history of crimes committed by foreign countries."
Others were more introspective.
"If the Red Guards smashed the Rabbit Head in the Old Summer Palace, whom will you cry to?" asks one person posting in the People's Daily Forum. "We Chinese have destroyed our own things more than the invaders, and the destruction is more extensive, lasting, and thorough."
Tao Duanfang, an international affairs commentator in Beijing, said that, though the bronze sculptures were national treasures, "what are really valuable are not these 'dead relics,' but China's economic progress, social stability and systemic progress."

Meantime, China has quickly moved to punish the auction house. 

Aiming to strike back where it could hurt most, China's State Administration of Cultural Heritage decreed tighter inspections on all cultural relics that Christie's seeks to bring in and out of China. That is meant to choke Christie's small but potentially big auction business in the country.

China confirms monk immolation in Tibetan town

 File photo shows a Chinese military policeman gesturing to stop taking photos near the famous Potala Palace in Tibet
BEIJING (AFP) — Chinese authorities have admitted a man in monk's robes set himself alight, according to state media, confirming there was unrest in a Tibetan town where activist groups said police shot the protester.
The man walked out of the Kirti Monastery in Aba and set himself on fire in a local street on Friday afternoon, Xinhua news agency said, citing the local Communist Party chief, Shi Jun.
Shi reportedly said police put out the fire, and that the man was taken to hospital with burn injuries to his neck and head.
The official said the man was wearing monk's robes, and that an investigation was underway. Few other details were given in the initial Xinhua report.
Tibetan activist groups had earlier said police shot the monk after he soused himself with petrol and set himself alight to protest against Chinese rule.
The monk, in his late 20s, had been holding a flag with an image of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama when he made his protest, the London-based group Free Tibet reported.
The incident came amid high tensions in Tibet and other areas of western China with Tibetan populations ahead of the ultra-sensitive 50th anniversary of a failed uprising on March 10 that led to the Dalai Lama fleeing to India.
Aba, in southwest China's Sichuan province, has been a flashpoint since police opened fire on an anti-Chinese protest there in March last year, in violence that activists said then left at least seven Tibetans dead.
The protest last year was part of unrest across the Tibetan plateau to mark the 49th anniversary of the failed 1959 uprising.China has ruled Tibet since 1951, a year after sending troops in to "liberate" the region from what it said was serfdom under the Dalai Lama.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama ditch ethics and kiss up to China

By Gerald Warner
Politicians in office should read what is on their desk before scrawling a signature at the bottom. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has just had a lesson in such caution. 
On February 21, in Beijing, Clinton cynically shed the patina of human rights concern that formerly cloaked the Obama administration by dismissing Chinese abuses in Tibet and elsewhere, claiming: "Our pressing on those issues can't interfere on the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis and the security crisis."
She went on to reveal the motivation behind this U-turn when she said: "I appreciate greatly the Chinese government's continuing confidence in United States Treasuries." 
That is politico-speak for "You can hang Tibetan monks up by their thumbs, if you like, but for heaven's sake don't stop buying US Treasury Bonds." 
China's $2 trillion monetary reserves make Obama and Clinton salivate.
This is the woman who last year urged George Bush to boycott the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing because of the regime's violence in Tibet and its failure to pressurise Sudan to stop "the genocide in Darfur". 
Amnesty International and Students for a Free Tibet were predictably appalled by this volte-face. That was excessively naïve of them: have they never encountered politicians before?
Four days later, however, Hillary fell victim to severe egg-on-face syndrome. 
Her own State Department issued its annual report on human rights which revealed that, over the past year, China has stepped up its repression in Tibet and Xinjiang: "The government's human rights record remained poor and worsened in some areas." 
The antidote, however, was robustly asserted in the preface to the report: "Not only will we seek to live up to our ideals on American soil, we will pursue greater respect for human rights as we engage other nations and people around the world."
The signature on that principled preface belonged to Hillary Rodham Clinton. 
In fairness, on her recent Far Eastern trip she did lambast abuse of human rights in North Korea. From that we can deduce that Kim Jong-il is not in the market for US Treasury Bonds.
Of course Clinton could not conceivably junk all the Democrats' human rights posturing without the approval of Barack Obama. 
He is equally hostage to fortune as his addiction to the spoken word, in incontinent torrents, now highlights his hypocrisy. 
We need go no further than his lacklustre Inauguration Address: "To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history..."
Unless, of course, you want to invest a few billion in American bonds. 
It is understandable that administrations should indulge in realpolitik; but the messiahs presiding over them need to hang up their haloes before doing so. 
The unravelling of America's Obama delusion will be a long and painful process, especially for the deluded voters who bought into the fantasy last November.

China "mothers" urge reckoning with 1989 bloodshed

Reuter
BEIJING: A group representing families of demonstrators killed or maimed in the armed crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests 20 years ago has urged China to name the dead, denouncing official silence over the anniversary.
The call came from the "Tiananmen Mothers" in a petition issued on Friday that carried 127 names of people who claimed their children or family members were victims of the June 4 quelling of the pro-democracy protests that challenged Communist Party power in 1989.
The group urged the government to investigate the military crackdown, name all the dead, compensate their families and punish "those responsible for the killings."
"It was nothing short of an unconscionable atrocity," the group said in the petition issued through Human Rights in China, a New York-based advocacy group.
"China has become like an airtight iron chamber and all the demands of the people about June 4, all the anguish, lament and moaning of the victims' relatives and the wounded have been sealed off," stated the petition addressed to China's national parliament, which opens its annual session next week.
The relatives' campaign for an official reckoning with the killings has long been led by Ding Zilin, a retired Beijing professor whose 17-year-old son was killed as tanks and armed troops swept through Beijing's streets.
She and other campaigners could not be contacted to comment on the petition or verify they signed it. But the group has made similar calls before.
The latest petition, however, comes during an especially sensitive year, when the Communist Party must navigate through potentially volatile anniversaries, including the 50th anniversary of the Dalai Lama's flight into exile from Tibet, while also coping with a slowed economy and rising joblessness.
After initial division and uncertainty over how to respond to the student-led demonstrations in the spring of 1989, the Communist Party sent troops to crush the protests, killing hundreds, some say thousands.
At the time, China denounced the protests as a "counter-revolutionary" plot. But these days they tend to call it a "political disturbance" and avoid extensive comment.

Politically incorrect tourism

A pilgrimage to the birthplace of a jackal in monk’s clothing
ON THE eastern edge of the Tibetan plateau lies a shrine that, according to China’s propagandists, should not exist. 
The house where the 14th Dalai Lama was born in 1935, under the name Lhamo Thondup, is tricky to find. It is tucked away in Hong Ya, a mountain hamlet of 200 people, which merges with the dusty crags to which it clings. 
Worshippers and tourists are not deterred. They seek out a pair of wooden doors with white prayer scarves draped through iron knockers. Inside, they pay their respects to a man China reviles.
The residence, with its throne room and prayer wheel spinning next to a portrait of the exiled leader, is a curious anomaly. It is there by Chinese government design. 
A casualty of the Cultural Revolution, it was rebuilt in 1986 when China was negotiating with the Tibetan government-in-exile. 
Xinhua, the official news agency, reported that it cost 350,000 yuan ($51,000) to resurrect, and boasts 61 rooms. In fact, there are six at a push. One stores a motorcycle.
Its status has changed from propaganda tool to unofficially sanctioned tourist spot (popular with Japanese tour groups) and discreet prayer site. 
The house is looked after by Gonpo Tashi, a distant cousin of the Dalai Lama. 
A tidy government wage of 3,000 yuan a month for his dual roles as village head and school headmaster helps him guard the Dalai Lama’s legacy. 
He charges tourists a 20-yuan entrance fee. 
Despite last year’s unrest, he won permission for a new building to house the main shrine. It now stands in the courtyard, painted brilliant yellow and topped by a gilded roof.
The shrine is tolerated because Hong Ya is an unlikely focal point for Tibetan resistance, high above a valley dominated by Chinese Hui Muslims. Hardly any locals call it Takster, its Tibetan name. 
Although 70% of the population is ethnically Tibetan, no one speaks Tibetan fluently. When the Dalai Lama was born, the region, regarded by Tibetans as part of Amdo, a province of their historic homeland, was under the control of a Muslim warlord, Ma Bufang. 
The Dalai Lama and his family didn’t learn Tibetan until they moved to Lhasa in 1939.
Periods of tension require tiptoeing. The road to Hong Ya was blocked by police last March after riots by Tibetans. A recent visit confirmed it was open again. 
Gonpo Tashi’s wife was showing round a well-heeled Tibetan couple, their hands clasped in prayer. 
A foreigner was not welcome. She whispered that her husband was next door with the local government boss. 
“Please leave or we’ll get into trouble,” she pleaded.

On Offer: Chinese History For Freedom

By Gady Epstein
This week's Yves Saint Laurent auction, of all things, offered an oddly appropriate epigraph for one of China's sensitive anniversaries this year: the 50th anniversary this March of a failed Tibetan revolt against Chinese rule and the flight of the Dalai Lama into exile in India.
China unsuccessfully tried to halt the Christie's auction in Paris of two bronze animal heads, a rabbit and a rat, which were plundered during the 19th-century Opium Wars from a Qing Dynasty palace in Beijing. 
Seller Pierre Berge said he would give them back to China for free if Chinese officials would, as he worded it on French radio before the auction, "declare they are going to apply human rights, give the Tibetans back their freedom and agree to accept the Dalai Lama on their territory".
Fifty years on, much to the consternation of China, the Tibet issue still captures the imagination of human rights activists, world leaders, journalists and celebrities. 
The "Free Tibet" mantra has faded somewhat in recent years, but the cause again made front-page headlines around the world last March when Beijing responded to a violent uprising among Tibetans with a massive display of martial force.
The Chinese government's tough response over Tibet and a series of protests of the Olympic torch run to Beijing threatened to cast a shadow over the games, and prompted an angry backlash from Chinese nationalists.
The tragic Sichuan earthquake and a successful Olympics then distracted the world's attention, but this year the government's security forces are sparing no effort as they prepare for the Tibet anniversary and two others, the 20th anniversary of the army's June 4 massacre of student protesters near Tiananmen Square and the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic. 
In Tibet, which China has ruled since 1951 after first sending in the People's Liberation Army in 1950, the government is determined to prevent another uprising as the calendar approaches March 10, the first of several anniversaries marking events from that tumultuous month in 1959.
China detained dozens of Tibetan activists in the weeks and months leading up to the Tibetan New Year on Feb. 25, a date which many ethnic Tibetans declined to celebrate this year despite official pressure to do so. 
The government also maintains a strong police and military presence in Tibet and ethnic Tibetan regions, and Westerners are generally not being granted visas to visit Lhasa.
It's only fitting that the auction that so irks Beijing is taking place in Paris. 
The French managed in particular to infuriate the Chinese last year as protesters in Paris mobbed a wheelchair-bound Chinese girl who was carrying the torch and as President Nicolas Sarkozy threatened to boycott the Olympics opening ceremonies over Tibet, prompting a Chinese boycott of French companies. 
Sarkozy then angered Beijing again more recently by meeting with the Dalai Lama.
And it was French troops who, along with the British, started this whole affair back in 1860, ransacking and looting the treasures of the Old Summer Palace, including 12 bronze animal heads representing the signs of the Chinese zodiac. 
Berge and Yves Saint Laurent's rabbit and rat are the last of the known surviving heads yet to be repatriated. 
To the Chinese, Berge this week was holding their history ransom for politics.
Of course, Chinese officials would argue, as they have repeatedly, that Tibetans do have their human rights and their freedom, and that the Dalai Lama and his "clique" are separatist traitors.
Only the weeks ahead will tell what kind of price Beijing will pay in bad publicity for sticking to this position. 
But we know that the price went up this week in Paris. Previously valued at $20 million, the pair of bronze heads sold Wednesday night for $36 million.

The Pain of Tibet

Dalai Lama The Dalai Lama, left, received the Peace Nobel Prize on December 11, 1989, from Egil Aarvk, president of the Nobel committee, in Oslo, Norway.
By Simon Elegant
I first met Dorje in front of the gates of the Longwu Monastery in Tongren, a town in China's far-western Qinghai province. Like the majority there, he was an ethnic Tibetan, a nomadic yak breeder in town on a pilgrimage. 
While friendly toward foreigners, Dorje nodded at the video cameras mounted above the road and said we'd better speak somewhere private. 
It's a grim commentary on the iron grip China maintains on Tibetan areas of the country that even a yak herdsman knows to be wary of video surveillance. 
In a sheltered corner of the monastery's walls, Dorje enumerated the wrongs visited on ordinary Tibetans by the Chinese authorities: beatings, arbitrary arrests and lengthy jail sentences, extortion, forced attendance at public vilifications of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama. 
The list went on, culminating in attempts to make Tibetans celebrate the Lunar New Year, something Dorje and others told me they had refused to do out of respect for Tibetans killed in Lhasa last March when anti-Chinese protests turned violent. 
Beijing says 19 people, mostly innocent Chinese shopkeepers, were killed in the unrest, but it's still by no means clear exactly what happened or how many died. The truth may be irrelevant compared with what Tibetans believe took place. 
During my trip through Qinghai, it became clear that ordinary Tibetans believe hundreds, possibly thousands of their compatriots were gunned down. 
When I asked Dorje if last year's protests could eventually be forgotten, he shook his head. "Even my son's sons and their sons will remember. We will never forget," he said.
The hardening attitudes on both sides mean there is no relief ahead for the Tibetan people. 
"I think violence is inevitable," says Lobsang Sangay, a senior fellow at Harvard Law's East Asian Legal Studies program who focuses on human rights in Tibet. So it's imperative for both sides to do their utmost to clear the logjam that has blocked progress since the Dalai Lama was forced to flee Lhasa nearly 50 years ago. 
On the Chinese side, there's little doubt that some officials realize their strategy of oppression at home and stonewalling overseas will one day backfire. 
But as Tibet scholar Robert Barnett of Columbia University says, their chance of influencing Beijing's policy before it is too late is vanishingly small: "Eventually, the hard-liners are going to be thrown out for having bungled their tasks. But by the time that happens, the chance of negotiating with the Dalai Lama might well have passed, and China will be stuck with an internal quagmire of its own making."
That leaves the Tibetan side, whose exile community has shown increasing signs of fracturing as younger Tibetans push for an approach different from the Dalai Lama's "middle way," which stresses patient negotiation. 
But short of launching an intifadeh that would condemn the Tibetan people to even greater suffering, there appears to be no realistic alternative that could increase pressure on Beijing.
The problem is, the middle way has hit a brick wall. 
Even the Dalai Lama recently said he had "given up" on negotiating with the Chinese and hinted he might step down, fearing that his position "is only becoming an obstruction instead of helping find a solution to the Tibet issue.
" Yet as an international celebrity and a deity to his people, he is the only person who can shift the equation. And the issue is pressing; he turns 74 in July.
That is why it may be time for the Dalai Lama to acknowledge that he has failed. For all his success in keeping the issue of Tibet on the world stage, this has not made and will not make one iota of difference to Beijing. 
His government-in-exile has always insisted on discussions about such matters as self-rule. 
Now it is time for one final, bold stroke: an announcement that the Dalai Lama is willing to return without any preconditions. 
Though Beijing has said it would accept him back on those terms, it is possible that the Chinese leadership--mindful of the return of exiles like the Ayatullah Khomeini to Iran--will try to block his path or refuse to live up to its promise to allow the Dalai Lama to go back to Tibet. 
But such a result would only broaden support and sympathy for the Tibetan cause.
And there are more optimistic scenarios. The Dalai Lama's presence in China might allow for improvement in the way Tibetans are treated. 
Whatever the possible outcomes, this last, desperate gesture is one that has to be made. 
The only alternative is for Dorje's son's sons and their sons to continue to live in a long, anguished twilight as communist cadres, Coca-Cola and Chinese immigrants slowly snuff out Tibet's unique heritage.

Fuming China bans Christie's, seeks return of 1.6m relics from 47 countries

By Saibal Dasgupta
BEIJING: A fuming China has decided to launch a worldwide drive seeking the return of 1.67 million cultural relics being shown in 2,000 museums. It has also issued orders making it difficult for Christie's to do business in China after the auction house sold two Chinese cultural relics on Wednesday. 
The anger stems from China's failure to stop the auction of two Chinese bronze heads, which the auction house sold for $35.9 million at a Paris auction. A group of Chinese lawyers had moved the court to block the auction while the government put pressure on the French government to intervene in the matter. 
The efforts proved futile. 
China's State Administration of Cultural Heritage thundered on Thursday that the move will have "serious effects on Christie's development in China". The Administration condemned the auction of the bronze heads that were looted by British and French forces from Beijing's Summer Palace in 1860 saying that it "damaged Chinese citizens' cultural rights and feelings". 
The Chinese government is also smarting over a comment from Pierre Berge, owner of the bronzes, who offered to swap the two sculptures if Beijing agreed to take measures for "human rights in China and the freedom of Tibet." 
Berge, who is the business partner of French fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent, has vowed to donate the proceeds of art auction from the Laurent collection for the welfare of AIDS patients. 
However, the administration of cultural heritage did not specify what action it would take for the return of cultural relics spread across 47 countries. It said that Christie's had violated international conventions and the "common understanding" that such artefacts should be returned to their country of origin. 
The government has ordered the entry and exit administrative departments for cultural heritage to carefully check "heritage items" that Christie's, its employees and agents seeks to import or export. It has been asked to immediately report to the local police and customs offices if officials come across relics owned by Christie's that might have been looted or smuggled, said the circular. 
"In recent years, Christie's has frequently sold cultural heritage items looted or smuggled from China, and all items involved were illegally taken out of the country," the government ordered said without specifying any past transactions. 

Buy them back

The Times
China could have regained its summer palace bronzes by opening its chequebook
China has come out fighting in its battle against the sale in Paris of two looted sculptures from the collection of Yves Saint Laurent. Literally.
Jackie Chan, the movie star-cum-martial arts wizard, has entered the row, his fists whirring like helicopter blades, to demand the return of the two bronzes. 
Removed when British and French forces sacked the Old Summer Palace in Beijing 1860, the two sculptures were knocked down to anonymous bidders for €14 million each in a Christie's sale orchestrated by Saint Laurent's partner, Pierre Bergé.
With China's relations with France already chilled by President Sarkozy's support for Tibet and the Dalai Lama, and with Mr Bergé having declared that the bronzes should be returned only “when China establishes human rights”, Mr Chan's arrival to accuse France of behaving disgracefully injects a novel tang into the brawl. The row over the cultural relics has turned into the continuation of diplomacy by kung fu.
This newspaper, too, finds itself playing a cameo role in the drama, since Lord Elgin (no, not that one; his son) claims to have been motivated to plunder the Palace of Emperor Qianlong to avenge the torture and murder of a score of Western prisoners: one of these victims was Thomas Bowlby, a correspondent for The Times.
But why China's fighting talk? The bronze rat and rabbit are part of a group of 12 animal fountainheads from the palace. 
China has already bought back five of the 12. It fears that buying any more “would give the ‘stolen' goods a coat of legitimacy”. 
No, it would not. A rich and proud China should have seized its chance to raise its arm and bid for the sculptures like anyone else.

How death of Times man led to sacking of Old Summer Palace

File:Looting of the Yuan Ming Yuan by Anglo French forces in 1860.jpg
Looting of the Old Summer Palace by Anglo-French forces in 1860 during the Second Opium War.
By Leo Lewis
For two terrible weeks in the autumn of 1860 Beijing’s Old Summer Palace was pillaged with glee, burnt in fury and stripped of its treasures – enough chaos and destruction for two bronze animal heads to be spirited out of China.
Amid the flames numerous mysteries were born: were the bronzes from Yves Saint Laurent’s collection taken by the British, French or Chinese? 
Where did they vanish to? Could they even have been taken before the French overpowered its weedy garrison of eunuch guards?
And despite the best efforts of the roving correspondent from The Times to cover the grim events of the Second Opium War, the intrepid Thomas Bowlby could not record those last moments in Beijing: he was a) partly responsible and b) dead.
The sacking of the palace shocked people thousands of miles away in London and Paris, even at the end of a bitter five-year war between the British and French on one side and China on the other. 
The initial ransacking was spontaneous; the two-day blaze that left the palace in ashes was a calculated punishment. 
A few years later many  treasures were on the art market – where ultimately they came into the hands of the fashion designer.
The Second Opium War was waged over trade and came after remorseless attempts to force China’s doors to open more widely to the West. 
The incident that broke the peace involved Chinese authorities storming a Hong Kong Chinese-owned ship in pursuit of a pirate captain. The ship may or may not have been flying the Red Ensign, and the Chinese may or may not have dishonoured the flag. Those uncertainties did not stop the fighting. 
By August 1860 a contingent was sent to the Chinese capital for peace talks. It included the famous envoy Harry Parkes and Bowlby.
On the first day the talks began; on the second the British and French envoys and their Indian guards were captured. About 20, including the man from The Times, died from beatings or starvation. Parkes was sent home.
Soon after, British and French forces marched on Beijing. Half a dozen French units peeled off and looted the Old Summer Palace, with some historians suggesting that they alone removed very large quantities of treasures. 
Others believe that the British and Chinese quickly joined in.
Two weeks later the British High Commissioner to China, Lord Elgin, heard about Bowlby’s death and immediately ordered the burning of the palace. 
In Stanley Lane-Poole’s 1901 account of Harry Parkes’s time in China, he describes the sacking, noting that the French had probably removed most of the valuable treasures before the British set fire to the palace. 
“The clouds of smoke, driven by the wind, hung like a vast pall over Peking. From an artistic point of view, it was an act of vandalism. From that of sound policy, it was statesmanlike.”

Thursday, February 26, 2009

China Fails to Halt the Sale of Looted Relics at a Paris Auction

By STEVEN ERLANGER
PARIS — Two bronze heads originally looted from China were sold Wednesday night for a total of nearly $35.9 million without commissions, after fierce but futile protests from China and a failed legal challenge to the auction.
The bronze heads were bought by anonymous bidders on the telephone, but the winning bids on both pieces were taken by the same Christie’s employee, Thomas Seydoux, suggesting that the buyer might be the same person. 
But Mr. Seydoux said later that he did not know who the buyers were.
In 2007, a similar bronze horse’s head was offered by Sotheby’s and bought privately by a businessman from Macao, Stanley Ho, for $8.9 million. Mr. Ho then gave the head to Beijing.
In Beijing, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage denounced the sale Thursday, saying in a statement: “This has hurt the cultural rights and interests of the Chinese people and the national sentiment and will have a serious effect on Christie’s development in China.” 
The statement, quoted by The Associated Press, did not elaborate.
In a separate notice, the cultural heritage agency ordered tighter inspections of certificates of origin and other documentation of all cultural relics that Christie’s seeks to bring in or out of the country, the A.P. said.
Wednesday night was the end of the extraordinary three-day sale of the collection of the French fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent and his personal and business partner, Pierre Bergé. 
The auction, which included noted works of art, furniture and silver from antiquity to modernism, was the most expensive ever for a private collection. 
Christie’s said that the entire auction, including commissions, brought roughly $478.8 million. After commissions, the proceeds will go to a variety of charitable foundations and causes, including the fight against AIDS.
The total before commissions, Mr. Seydoux said, was roughly $415.4 million.
The bronze heads sold here, a rat and a rabbit, are part of a 12-animal fountain, based on the Chinese zodiac, that was constructed around 1750 from the design of Jesuit priests in the Qing dynasty. 
The fountain was built for the imperial gardens of the Old Summer Palace during the reign of Emperor Qianlong in the 18th century.
According to Rosemary Scott, an Asian art expert at Christie’s, the Chinese built “European palaces” in part of the park that were designed by European Jesuit missionaries employed by the Chinese court; the same missionaries designed the fountain, which consisted of a huge marble shell and the bronze animal heads on clothed human bodies carved in stone.
By 1795 the fountains were no longer used. 
The palace itself was destroyed and sacked by British and French forces in 1860, and the heads were presumably taken then.
Despite the heads’ European design, the Chinese insist that they are an integral part of their cultural heritage and represent another symbol of the Western despoliation of China during the Opium Wars of the 19th century.
Chinese groups tried to sue in France to block the auction but failed, and the Chinese Foreign Ministry has demanded that the heads be returned.
On Monday night, Mr. Bergé said he would give the heads to China if Beijing would “observe human rights and give liberty to the Tibetan people and welcome the Dalai Lama.”

China slams Christie's auction of looted relics

 A tourist takes picture of the posters advertising an exhibit showing sculptures of bronze heads from the Chinese zodiac disappeared in 1860, when French and British forces sacked the former Summer Palace on the outskirts of Beijing at the close of the second Opium War, at the ruins of the former Summer Palace in Beijing, China, Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2009.
 In this Feb. 25, 2009 photo, tourists visit the water fountain site where sculptures of bronze heads from the Chinese zodiac disappeared in 1860, when French and British forces sacked the former Summer Palace on the outskirts of Beijing at the close of the second Opium War, at the ruins of the former Summer Palace in Beijing, China
 In this Feb. 19, 2009 photo, a Chinese man rests near palm prints made on snow at the ruins of the Old Summer Palace in Beijing, China. 
By GILLIAN WONG 
BEIJING (AP) — Beijing slammed auction house Christie's for selling two imperial bronze sculptures it says should have been returned to China and vowed Thursday to continue to hunt for and reclaim other similarly looted relics.
The State Administration of Cultural Heritage said the sale of two 18th century bronzes as part of an auction of art works owned by the late designer Yves Saint Laurent on Wednesday would affect Christie's interests in China.
The disputed fountainheads — heads of a rat and a rabbit — sold for 28 million euros ($36 million) at the Paris auction to an unidentified telephone bidder or bidders.
The auction "goes against the spirit of relevant international conventions and the international common understanding that cultural relics should be returned to their country of origin," the administration said in a statement.
Christie's auction of the two bronzes did not break any laws or international agreements, but China argued the relics are a part of its cultural heritage and should be returned.
The administration ordered tighter inspections of all cultural relics that Christie's seeks to bring in or out of mainland China.
The auction house said it regretted the administration's move to impose reprisal measures on Christie's and stood by the sale of the fountainheads, saying the pieces' legal ownership had been "clearly confirmed."
"We continue to believe that sale by public auction offers the best opportunity for items to be repatriated as a result of worldwide exposure," the firm said in a statement.
Christie's sales on mainland China are carried out through licensing partner Forever International Auction Company Limited, an auction house in Beijing. Its sales in 2008 totaled $6.2 million (40 million yuan), according to a statement on Christie's Web site. 
In Hong Kong, sales last year totaled $452.3 million, it said.
The sculptures disappeared from the Old Summer Palace on the outskirts of Beijing when French and British forces sacked and burned it at the close of the second Opium War in 1860. Today, only ruins remain.
The cultural heritage administration said it will continue to recover looted Chinese relics through "all necessary channels."
China's frustrated efforts at securing the return of the bronzes underscores the challenges the country faces trying to recover numerous cultural objects stolen more than a century ago when plunder was a given in warfare.
A private group, China's Lost Cultural Relics Recovery Program, estimates there are more than 1 million relics outside the country, scattered in 200 museums in 47 countries and that 10 times as many could be in private collections.
China appeared unwilling to purchase the disputed bronzes pieces from their new owner or owners.
"That would give the 'stolen' goods a coat of legitimacy," the Old Summer Palace Museum said in a statement.
But the state conglomerate China Poly Group bought three Summer Palace fountainheads — the ox, monkey and tiger — in 2000 for about $4 million at auctions. The pig and horse heads were later both purchased by Chinese business figures and donated to China. 
The fates of the other five are unknown.

China won't trade art for rights in Tibet

By Antoaneta Bezlova 
BEIJING - As nationalistic passions burn over the fate of looted Chinese artworks auctioned in Paris this week, Beijing is attempting to keep the focus on past humiliations by Western powers and away from delicate issues like human rights and China's handling of Tibet. 
The twisted tale of two animal heads, cast in bronze, that once adorned the Qing Dynasty pleasure gardens in Beijing and disappeared, allegedly in pillaging by the British and French armies in 1860, took another turn last week when their current owner suggested he would return them if Beijing agreed to free Tibet. 
"I would be very happy to go myself and bring these two Chinese heads to put them in the Summer Palace in Beijing," Pierre Berge, Yves Saint Laurent's former business partner and companion, told the media in Paris. 
"All they have to do is to declare they are going to apply human rights, give the Tibetans back their freedom and agree to accept the Dalai Lama on their territory," Berge said. 
State media reports have downplayed Berge's statement, focusing instead on the efforts of patriotic Chinese overseas to block the sale and recover the stolen artworks. 
A group of 85 volunteer lawyers had submitted an application to a Paris court asking it to stop auctioneer Christie's from putting the two sculptures under the hammer this week. 
"Personally, I have little hope that this single lawsuit would succeed in recovering the two animal heads," Ren Xiaohong, a Chinese attorney representing the Association for the Protection of China Art in Europe, told the Beijing Youth Daily. 
"But if this lawsuit manages to raise people's awareness of the fate of stolen Chinese treasures and arrest the loss of more relics through theft and smuggling, it would be well worth the effort," Ren said. 
The Paris court has rejected the appeal and back home the planned auction has raised nationalistic hackles. 
On the weekend, campuses of several Beijing universities saw sporadic actions by students campaigning against the auction. 
At the Capital Normal University, students lined up to sign a gigantic banner declaring: "China has unquestionable ownership of the looted relics." 
Linking human rights, Tibet and the stolen relics has irked the Chinese Internet public and elicited a series of angry responses. 
"Since [French President Nicolas] Sarkozy came to power, France has made too many blunders," said one Chinese netizen on the Internet portal douban.com. "It is narcissistic to believe that one can use two animal heads as a trade off for human rights in Tibet," wrote another who called himself "dark star". 
The two bronze heads of a rat and a rabbit were acquired by St Laurent and Berge as they amassed one of the world's most impressive private art collections. After St Laurent's death last year, Berge announced he would sell the collection, estimated at up to US$350 million, and donate the proceeds to medical research to fight HIV/AIDS. 
"Auctioning cultural objects looted in war time not only offends the Chinese people and undermines their cultural rights, but also violates relevant international conventions," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu told the media last week. 
The rat and the rabbit are among 12 zodiac animals designed by Jesuit missionary Father Benoit in the mid-18th century as part of a water clock embellishing the rococo-style palaces and fountains of Yuanming Yuan -- the old summer residence of Chinese emperors. The 12 animals represent different hours of the day and night, at two-hour periods, each spouting water at an appointed time. 
Official accounts hold that the fountain was destroyed during the 1860 assault on Beijing by Western allied forces in retaliation for the torture and death of British and French hostages. The palaces were first looted and then Lord Elgin, commander of the British troops, ordered the gardens and buildings to be set aflame. 
But at least one study disagrees with the official version of events. Hope Danby, in her 1950 book The Garden of Perfect Brightness claims the water clock that held the bronze animal heads was dismantled long before European forces arrived on the scene. 
About 20 years before the burning of the old Summer Palace, the wife of the reigning emperor, Daoguang, took such a strong dislike to the animals that she insisted on their removal. "They have completely disappeared," Danby wrote. "It is surmised that they were melted down, their metal being remolded into other ornaments." 
Only seven of the original 12 heads have resurfaced. 
Nine years ago, three waterspouts, the heads of an ox, a monkey and a tiger, turned up for auction in Hong Kong. The Poly Group -- a Chinese state-owned conglomerate dealing in weapons and real estate -- bought the heads and returned them to the government. Two more heads were bought by Stanley Ho, a casino mogul from Macau -- those of a pig in 2003 from a private collector and of a horse for $8.8 million at auction in 2007. He donated them to Beijing museums. 
The appearance of the rat and rabbit heads at the Paris auction has rekindled a wave of patriotic indignation, termed by some commentators in China as the "Yuanming Yuan syndrome". 
The burning of Yuanming Yuan, or Garden of Perfect Brightness, has bedeviled relations between China and the West for some 150 years. 
China sees its destruction as the beginning of a "century of shame and humiliation" inflicted on the Chinese nation by foreign colonial powers. 
Until a few months before the Summer Olympic Games opened in Beijing last year, a sign at the entrance of Yuanming Yuan exhorted the public never to forget that chapter of history. "Do not forget the national shame, rebuild the Chinese nation," it said. 
In recent years, the increasing mercantilism of Chinese society has made party ideologues rely more and more on nationalistic rhetoric to rally people. 
Beijing has also deployed its increasing political and economic clout to pressure other nations to hand over stolen Chinese treasures. But some see a potential downside to whipping up nationalist sentiments in China's quest to recover its lost artworks. 
"The price of scores of Chinese treasures auctioned abroad has escalated dramatically not the least because of China's elevation of the quest as an issue of national priority," said commentator Dan Shibing in the Monday China Business Journal. 
"As China and Chinese entrepreneurs have been willing to pay ever higher sums to recover lost treasures, these artworks have become yet again an object of plunder,'' Dan said. 
The Paris auction is opening at a time of nationalistic backlash in China against France because of its perceived support for the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader. 
A Chinese delegation's trip to Paris was canceled after Sarkozy met with the Dalai Lama in December. And a high-level procurement team leaving this week for the European Union to boost China's ties with the bloc has pointedly omitted France from its list of shopping destinations. 

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

US hits China on human rights

By MATTHEW LEE
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States on Wednesday scolded China for a litany of human rights abuses last year even though Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton suggested during her recent Beijing visit that the issue would take a back seat to broader concerns like the global financial crisis.
In a report on the state of human rights around the world, the State Department singled out China for numerous violations while noting a general deterioration in conditions in other countries in Asia, the Middle East, Africa and eastern Europe.
The report noted some improvements in Afghanistan and Iraq, two countries where American troops are fighting insurgencies. 
The document also made clear that the Obama administration welcomes comments about U.S. human rights practices, an oblique reference to international criticism of America's own treatment of prisoners taken in those conflicts.
In its section on China, the State Department accused China of stepping up "severe cultural and religious repression" of minorities in Tibet and elsewhere as well as increasing its detention and harassment of dissidents.
"The government of China's human rights record remained poor and worsened in some areas," the State Department said. 
The report noted that Chinese authorities continued to limit citizens' right to privacy, freedom of speech, assembly, movement and association. It said authorities also committed extrajudicial killings and torture, coerced confessions from prisoners and used forced labor.
The report said the abuses peaked around high-profile events like last year's Olympic Games in Beijing and unrest in Tibet and that toward the end of last year the government began harassing activists who signed a petition calling for respect of human rights.
The report covers 2008 and was largely drafted during President George W. Bush's administration, but Clinton signed off on the findings.
Clinton was criticized by human rights groups for saying on a trip to Asia last week that while the Obama administration is deeply concerned about human rights in China the matter could not be allowed to interfere with attempts to cooperate with Beijing on the worldwide economic meltdown and fighting global climate change.
Clinton said a continuing debate over human rights with the Chinese government was not necessarily productive, drawing fire from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch as well as several Republicans in Congress.
Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., accused Clinton of "a shocking display of pandering" to China and of having "dismissed, devalued and debased human rights" in the country.
Clinton declined to answer questions from reporters when she presented the report. But she stressed that the Obama administration would work with both government and private organizations to improve human rights conditions throughout the world.
"We must rely on more than one approach as we strive to overcome tyranny and subjugation that weakens the human spirit, limits human possibility and undermines human progress," she said.
During her trip, Clinton also questioned whether the current U.S. policy on military-ruled Myanmar, which relies heavily on sanctions, was effective in attempting to restore democracy.
Wednesday's report said Myanmar's military regime committed "severe human rights abuses" and "brutally suppressed dissent" through a campaign of extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and torture.
In its section on the U.S. human rights record, the State Department said the Obama administration would "hear and reply forthrightly to concerns about our own practices."
The report noted that President Barack Obama has pledged to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the end of the year and has barred harsh interrogation techniques of prisoners. Critics said some of the interrogation methods used during the Bush administration constitute torture.
In Afghanistan, where many Guantanamo inmates were captured, the report said rights conditions had continued to improve since the 2001 fall of the Taliban. But the report noted that the country's record "remained poor" because of a weak central government and the ongoing insurgency.
In Iraq, the report said a substantial improvement in security and easing of sectarian tensions had resulted in progress. But "continuing insurgent and extremist violence against civilians undermined the government's ability to uphold the rule of law, resulting in widespread and severe human rights abuses," the report noted.
Despite a return to civilian democratic rule in Pakistan in 2008, the report said human rights conditions there are still "poor."
The report also took Russia to task for failing to protect the rights of their citizens, warning that civil liberties in Russia "continued to be under siege."

Chinese bronzes from YSL collection sold at auction

Photo Christie's auctions a bronze rat head made for the Zodiac fountain of the Emperor Qianlong's Summer Palace in China from the private art collection of late French fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent at the Grand Palais Museum in Paris February 25, 2009. The rat head, and a rabbit head from the same fountain, are part of a collection created over five decades by the designer and his business partner and companion Pierre Berge and described as one of the most important in private hands. The Chinese government formally demanded earlier this week the cancellation of the auction in Paris of the two historic bronze sculptures claimed by China.
PARIS (Reuters) - Two bronze sculptures once owned by Yves Saint Laurent that are claimed by China sold at auction for more than 31 million euros ($39.50 million) on Wednesday.
The two historic sculptures, representing the head of a rat and the head of a rabbit, were bought for 15,745,000 euros each by a telephone bidder on the final evening of the auction of the late designer's art collection.
The 18th century Qing dynasty bronzes were seized from the Summer Palace in Beijing in 1860 during the Opium Wars and China has said they should be returned.
Pierre Berge, Saint Laurent's former partner, has rejected China's claim but had offered to hand over the pieces if the Beijing government guaranteed human rights and allowed the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama to return home.
A Paris court on Monday rejected an application by a group representing Chinese cultural interests to have the sale blocked but China has formally demanded that the auction of the two pieces be stopped.
The sale was part of the auction of what has been called one of the most important art collections in private hands, which has already raised some 364 million euros, well above the initial 300 million euros estimate.
Berge decided to sell collection, built up over five decades and which included pieces ranging from paintings by Pablo Picasso to art nouveau furniture and sculptures such as the two Chinese bronzes after Saint Laurent's death last year.
He intends to donate the proceeds to charities and medical research.

So who did loot those French-Italian animal heads?

By Richard Spencer
Not surprisingly, the Chinese government has been unable to persuade the French or Christie's to stop the sale of two bronze animal heads
The heads -- the rabbit and the rat -- are part of the Yves St Laurent collection, being sold by his former lover and business partner, Pierre Berge. They go under the hammer later today (that's Wednesday).
But this is part of a long-running saga whose chapters have come to follow predictable lines. As the 12 heads are put up for auction, there is an outcry that items stolen by the British and French imperialists are being put on sale rather than simply being returned whence they came. 
The outcry has no effect -- the looting of the Summer Palace in 1860, at the end of the Second Opium War, is too long ago to be affected by treaties and legislation about the return of stolen goods. 
Western powers look nervously at the other contents of their museums and collections, and the world in general has a chance to remind itself of the evils of imperialism.
Then some wealthy Chinese philanthropist steps in and buys the head for the nation.
There's no denying that the burning of the Summer Palace was an atrocity. But it is odd and perhaps unfortunate that attention has come to focus on these particular relics. 
State media, while particularly sensitive to the European insult, are often rather careful to avoid hyping these items up as examples of high Chinese culture: for good reason, as they are not really Chinese, and the whole story of the fountain of which they are part is shrouded in ambiguity.
There is in fact no certainty that the heads were looted by the French or British at all (as I read it) -- even though it is always written (including by me) that they were.
My source for this information is my friend Jasper Becker's scintillating oral history of Beijing, City of Heavenly Tranquillity, which I have written about before. Geremie Barme, perhaps the leading contemporary overseas historian of Beijing's palaces, has also described some of the background to this, though he doesn't go into the details of the stealing of these particular bronzes.
(The piece linked to contains a fantastically terrible account of the looting, by the way).
The European nature of these bronzes is well known to those who write about such matters. Jeremiah Jenne, at Jottings from the Granite Studio, gives a good summary of the debate so far, and I hope he reads this blogpost as it encroaches on his territory and I'd be interested to know what he thinks, since he's also an expert.
First, you have to know that by the time the fountain was erected, during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor in the 18th century, the Summer Palace had become an extraordinary sort of plaything, in which scenes from China and the Heavens were reconstructed for the emperor's amusement (including a fully operational market, where actors bought and sold goods to each other and even pickpocketed each other). It was a sort of Windows of the World of its day. Qianlong, who had a coteries of European Jesuits at court who were allowed to do little by way of proselytising and thus had time on their hands, were put to work building a series of European-style palaces. 
These have since become the best-known aspects of the Summer Palace, though they took up a relatively small part of the gardens and were not actually inhabited by the court.
Giuseppe Castiglione, an Italian, was the master planner -- he also painted now famous portraits of the court -- and Father Michel Benoist, a Frenchman no less, designed the enormous water fountain with the 12 animal heads. The animals spouted water, each one for the two hours corresponding to the time of day for which he was responsible. All 12 went off at noon.
The heads themselves, though, were probably designed by Castiglione himself.
That much is agreed. It gets more interesting though.
There were (according to Barme) always doubts in the Chinese imperial mind about this fountain: it offended the laws of nature, since the water was shot upwards rather than flowing downhill as it ought. 
Then, when Father Benoist died (and the remaining Jesuits were expelled), knowledge of the complex hydraulics which operated the fountain died with him. It could not be repaired when it went wrong, and so eventually the only way to work it was for eunuchs to bring buckets and reload from the top, which even the emperor could see was a bit of a waste of effort.
Eventually, the copper piping was deemed too valuable an asset to waste, so it was dug up and the fountain decayed from underneath.
According to Becker, quoting the British writer Hope Danby who visited in the 1930s, studied the site and spoke to descendants of the contractors who built the fountain (among other researches), the empress of the Daoguang emperor took such a passionate dislike to the fountain (whose heads are, in fact, rather crude in my view, and not as fine as genuinely Chinese bronzes of that or any other period) that she had the animals torn down around 1840.
That of course doesn't answer the question of what happened after that or how they got out of China. The obvious guess is that they were stored somewhere in the Palace gardens, and were indeed looted after the Palace was set on fire. Danby thought they had been melted down -- though that is clearly wrong.
So what happened between 1840, and the 1880s, when an inventory was taken of what was left of the Summer Palace, in which the heads do not appear? Well, the absolute answer is that we don't know.
Barme told me today that he doubted Danby's tale. He reckoned it would have been unforgivable lese-ancestral-majeste to destroy anything erected by Qianlong, Daoguang's grandfather. He says there are no contemporary records saying this happened -- but also that there is no other evidence for what happened to the heads.
The looting in 1860 was undeniably thorough -- the soldiers went through the warehouses. At one stage there was some sort of auction of goods. But the records are also clear that local Chinese happily joined in the looting -- perhaps because the imperial court was Manchu rather than Han Chinese, there was less sense of patriotic solidarity than there clearly is now.
The Chinese also periodically continued to loot the remains for decades (indeed a century) afterwards. Despite the fire, the palaces were by no means entirely destroyed; they could have been repaired, and indeed the Western palaces were offered to the invading powers to reopen as their embassies (the powers refused, taking over what became the Legation Quarter of central Beijing instead).
The destruction of the Old Summer Palace was really completed when the New Summer Palace was rebuilt, as what could be taken away was salvaged and reused. The site was then used by Beijing residents as a quarry, with Hope Danby witnessing marble blocks being hauled away for building projects in the 1930s. There was more damage in the Cultural Revolution.
But what happened to the heads in all of this is unknown. If there is provenance of the rabbit and rat dating back to when they were taken, Christie's have not chosen to make it public. 
Seven have so far turned up abroad or in Hong Kong at auction; that would immediately suggest that they had been taken overseas -- perhaps by French or British soldiers. But it is also possible they were sold on by Chinese looters later -- a lot of Chinese art disappeared abroad over the years in this way. One head ended up in a swimming pool in Beverley Hills.
The pillaging of the Summer Palace was a conscious punishment for the behaviour of the Qing (Manchu) court, who had tortured and killed the peace emissaries sent by the allies to Beijing -- 18 were mutilated and murdered, including The Times correspondent, while the two leading British officials were found half-starved.
The French general, Baron Gros, wanted to retaliate by destroying the Forbidden City and the city of Beijing: the Summer Palace, he said, was merely a "maison de plaisance" and thus useless. But Lord Elgin, the British general, distinguished (as we do today, do we not) between the people and the government: only the emperor and his officials, not the (Han) Chinese people, should suffer, he said. 
So they destroyed the Summer Palace, and the Chinese joined in.

China haunts the sale of the century

A shopkeeper stands next to a model of a bronze rabbit head, one of the 18th century Qing dynasty bronzes that are part of a collection of 12 inspired by the Chinese zodiac, at a souvenir shop in the Old Summer Palace in Beijing today. A French judge authorised on February 23 the sale of two Chinese bronzes - taken from the Old Summer Palace 150 years ago by British and French troops - at an auction of Yves Saint Laurent artworks, rejecting a plea for them to be returned to China. The 18th century Qing dynasty bronzes are to go under the hammer
By John Lichfield in Paris 
Beijing today threatened to chill Franco-Chinese relations unless Paris removed two bronze animal heads from the final day of a record-breaking sale of the art collection of the late fashion designer, Yves Saint Laurent.
The warning cast a diplomatic shadow over the three-day "sale of the century", which has defied the global financial crisis and established half-a-dozen new art market records.
China claims that the two bronze heads, a rat and a rabbit, valued at €10m each, were pillaged from the Summer Palace in Beijing by French and British troops during the Second Opium War in 1860. A French court rejected an attempt to halt their sale yesterday.
Beijing said yesterday that the auction of the heads -- due to take place in Paris tomorrow afternoon -- would break international law and "seriously harm... the national feelings of the Chinese people". 
M. Saint Laurent's former boyfriend, business manager and heir, Pierre Bergé -- who is selling their joint art collection -- said earlier that he would return the bronze sculptures to China under certain conditions.
"All that I ask," he said "is that China respects human rights, gives Tibet its freedom and agrees to the return of the Dalai Lama." 
M. Bergé's statement was angrily dismissed by Beijing as "ridiculous".
In a couple of hours last night, the auction of the eclectic Saint Laurent-Bergé collection smashed the previous world record for the dispersal of privately-owned works of art. 
More than Euros 206m were raised on the first evening, including new records for works by Henri Matisse, Constantin Brancusi, Marcel Duchamp, James Ensor and Piet Mondrian.
However, the great surprise of the first day of the sale was the failure of the supposed pièce de résistance of the Saint Laurent collection -- Pablo Picasso's "Instruments de musiques sur un guéridon" -- to reach its Euros 25m reserve price.
M. Bergé, who is to give the entire proceeds of the sale to AIDS research and other charities, said that he would now keep the painting. 
"You might think that I was disappointed," he said. "Not a bit of it. I have had an extraordinary auction and, what's more, I have gained a Picasso."
Interest in the sale has been so great that it has been installed by Christies in one of the largest exhibition spaces in Paris, Le Grand Palais, just off the Champs Elysées. 
Over 30,000 people queued during the weekend to view the 730 works, ranging from Roman antiquities to paintings by Andy Warhol.
Art dealers, art lovers and collectors from all over the world are attending the sale, including Bianca Jagger and Viscount Linley, son of Princess Margaret. 
Other bids are being made through 100 telephone lines installed for the occasion.
Despite the global financial crisis, the auction seems likely to exceed its total predicted value of Euros 300m. 
On the second day yesterday, a painting by the early 19th century French artist Théodore Géricault -- "Portrait d'Alfred et Elisabeth Dedreux" -- sold for Euros 8m, double its reserve price. 
A painting by Frans Hals (Dutch, early 17th century) -- "Portrait d'homme tenant un livre -- sold for Euros 3.1m, three times its expected price.
The greatest surprise so far has been the Euros 32m paid by an unknown private buyer for the Matisse painting "Les coucous, tapis bleu et rose." This smashed the previous record for works by the 20th century French post-impressionist.
A wooden sculpture by the 20th century Romanian artist, Constantin Brancusi, "Madame L.R", sold for Euros 26m. 
An ordinary bottle of perfume still in its box -- a piece of "ready-made" art sanctified by the 20th centrury French surrealist Marcel Duchamp -- sold for €7.9m.

Demoting human rights

By Sonia Cardenas
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may have set back the cause of human rights in China when she said on her Asia tour that while the United States will continue to press China on issues such as Tibet, Taiwan and human rights, "our pressing on those issues can't interfere with the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis and the security crisis."
Clinton's position has two potentially detrimental effects. 
It undermines the long-fought campaign for a comprehensive foreign policy, one recognizing the interdependence of human rights concerns with traditional strategic goals. And it ultimately fails civil society groups in China and those suffering human rights abuses.
Clinton's defenders would point out that there is nothing new here. 
The debate over linking human rights and trade preferences, for instance, is longstanding. It was President Bill Clinton, after all, who de-linked the two foreign policy issues in Chinese-U.S. relations in 1994, when China's "most favored nation" status was formally separated from its human rights record.
But treating human rights as an integral part of foreign policy reflects a much broader trend, dating mostly to the 1970s. 
Beginning then, countries like the United States incorporated foreign policy criteria into their domestic laws, so that economic and military assistance became contingent on a country's performance on human rights.
The reality of foreign aid is, of course, far more complex, but recognition that human rights is one of several interrelated foreign policy interests is well established in domestic legislation and political discourse.
This is what makes Clinton's remarks all the more baffling. 
She was not obligated on this visit, her first official one to China, to delineate specifics. She could have taken a pragmatic stand, issuing a vaguely worded but firm statement supporting human rights.
Instead, she went out of her way to downgrade human rights, placing economic, environmental and security relations above the abuse of countless individuals under Chinese rule -- members of minority and religious groups who are systematically repressed, detainees and prisoners who are tortured, human rights and civil society activists arbitrarily detained, women and children routinely subjected to violence and discrimination and tens of thousands without recourse to an effective justice system, as well as widespread censorship.
Clinton's language and the Chinese reaction were reminiscent of the Cold War, when there was a rigid hierarchy of foreign policy interests and human rights was readily traded off for more tangible goals.
The Chinese response said it all. The Chinese foreign minister, Yang Jiechi, expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue with the United States "on the premise of mutual respect and noninterference in each other's internal affairs."
"Noninterference" is the quintessential defense for rejecting human rights pressures, drawing on traditional notions of a state's sovereign right to do whatever it wants within its jurisdiction.
Hillary Clinton's position does not match the current thinking about human rights. 
For decades, with globalization blurring boundaries and human rights becoming a global concern, states claiming noninterference have been taken to task internationally.
There is also mounting research showing that respect for human rights is closely associated with states that are more democratic, more economically developed and less prone to war.
Further evidence suggests that human rights pressure -- not just dialogue -- is essential for eventual reform. 
In fact, some research indicates that the consistency of applying human rights pressure, even at the level of rhetoric, is more important than the intensity of pressure applied.
Such pressures lead governments to make concessions, which in turn can empower groups to mobilize and demand further change, occasionally setting in motion a longer term dynamic of gradual reform. 
All told, there are both principled and pragmatic reasons to promote human rights seriously in foreign policy.
Clinton's human rights moment in China will not be easily forgotten, but it presents the new administration with an opportunity to revisit its foreign policy rhetoric -- calibrating it finely so that it upholds human rights firmly, without compromise, but does not unnecessarily antagonize powerful states like China.
Words signal commitments, and human rights activists inside and outside China will look to see whether the United States is ready to exert real leadership. 
Let's hope that Clinton's remarks were not a sign of things to come.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

China formally demands halt of bronze heads sale

Photo People take part in a Christie's auction of the private art collection of late French fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent at the Grand Palais museum on the Champs Elysees in Paris February 23, 2009.
BEIJING (Reuters) - The Chinese government formally demanded cancellation of the auction in Paris of two historic bronze sculptures claimed by China, after a previous effort by a cultural group was rejected by a French court.
The sculptures, of a rat and a rabbit head, are part of an art collection from the estate of French fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent, which went on sale at a Christie's auction that started in Paris on Monday.
China claims ownership of the heads that were taken from Beijing's Summer Palace when it was razed by invading French and British forces in 1860 during the Second Opium War.
"The State Administration of Cultural Heritage has formally informed the auctioneer of our strong opposition to the auction, and clearly demanded its cancellation," Ma Zhaoxu, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, told a news conference.
APACE, an association representing Chinese cultural and heritage interests, had filed an appeal to have the sale blocked but was turned down by the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris.
Ma scorned an offer by Pierre Berge, Saint Laurent's former business manager and companion, to exchange the sculptures for promises to guarantee human rights and allow exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, back into Tibet.
"Using the pretext of human rights to infringe on the Chinese people's fundamental cultural rights is just ridiculous," Ma said.
Interest in the case goes beyond the art world because of the tensions between Paris and Beijing over French President Nicolas Sarkozy's decision to meet the Dalai Lama, whom Beijing considers a separatist.
China's State Administration of Cultural Heritage also directly condemned the auction, saying any such sale was "in contravention of the basic spirit of the relevant international treaties."
An Administration official also told the web site of the People's Daily -- newspaper of the ruling Communist Party, that the auction "would seriously harm the cultural rights and national feeling of the Chinese people."
Christie's values the sculptures at 8 to 10 million euros each. Five of the original 12 heads are now in China.

Jailed Billionaires Show New Face of China as Markets Unravel

By William Mellor

Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- If China’s richest man knew he was about to become the most prominent casualty of the country’s love-hate relationship with capitalism, he didn’t show it this past August.
Huang Guangyu, a peasant’s son who became a billionaire by building Gome Electrical Appliances Holding Ltd. from scratch, outlined plans for continued expansion of the 800-store appliance chain.
He told the board members gathered in the company’s mauve- carpeted executive offices 61 floors above Hong Kong’s Victoria Harbor that Gome’s profit had tripled in the first half of 2008 from a year earlier.
The directors lunched on Cantonese dishes ordered in from Man Wah, one of the city’s ritziest restaurants. “It was a very pleasant, chatty meeting,” says Mark Greaves, 51, chief executive officer of London-based investment bank Hanson Capital, who is one of the company’s two non-Chinese directors. “Mr. Huang talked about his crusade to take Gome to all corners of China.”
Greaves hasn’t seen or spoken to Huang, 39, since. One morning in November, the dapper, baby-faced tycoon failed to turn up, along with his Maybach limousine, at Gome’s Beijing headquarters, where he normally worked such long hours that he had installed a double bed in the office adjacent to his own.

Under Investigation
On Nov. 24, the company halted trading in its shares on the Hong Kong exchange. Three days later, Beijing police disclosed that one of China’s most celebrated entrepreneurs was under investigation for share manipulation.
Three months later, Huang and his wife and former co- director, Lisa Du Juan, remain incommunicado, along with Zhou Yafei, Gome’s former chief financial officer, somewhere in China’s penal system, leaving Greaves and his remaining co- directors scrambling to avert the company’s collapse.
Gome’s investors -- which include Capital Research & Management, a unit of Capital Group Cos., the largest U.S. manager of stock and bond mutual funds; Warburg Pincus LLC; and clients of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley -- still can’t trade the suspended stock. All four fund managers declined to comment.
During China’s 30-year boom, foreign investors bet heavily on the so-called red capitalists: emerging billionaires who symbolized the nation’s new wealth.

Stake’s Value Plunges
As of Feb. 23, Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong had plunged more than 60 percent from their peak in October 2007 compared with a 50 percent fall in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Some of the companies that have crashed the hardest are those built by billionaire highfliers such as Huang, whose 34 percent stake in Gome is now worth less than one fourth of the $2.8 billion it was valued at on Sept. 1.
Even in the good times, China’s new rich thrived only at the whim of an autocratic and still nominally communist regime. Now, collapsing global demand for its exports has plunged the world’s fastest-growing major economy into crisis, causing thousands of factory closings.
More than 20 million workers have lost their jobs, the government disclosed in February. 
A record 6 million students will leave universities this year unable to walk straight into the high-paying jobs that their predecessors took for granted. 
Strikes and mass protests occur daily.
Only corruption continues to flourish -- at a cost of $86 billion a year, according to the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

‘Defense Mechanism’
And China’s embattled leaders are seeking somewhere to place the blame. 
“Maybe people are lashing out as a defense mechanism,” Greaves says. “There seems to be some tension between business and politicians.”
The economy won’t improve anytime soon. 
China’s breakneck growth plunged to 9 percent in 2008 from 13 percent in ’07. 
This year, bearish economists predict it will fall to a pitiful -- by Chinese standards -- range of zero to 5.5 percent. That’s despite the announcement in November of a $585 billion government stimulus package. 
“We must urgently reverse sliding growth,” Premier Wen Jiabao said on Jan. 19. China is targeting 8 percent growth this year.
China’s corporate carnage has surprised investors even more than the mayhem that’s taking place elsewhere in the world, says Nick Toovey, who oversees $80 billion, including Chinese stocks, at ING Investment Management Ltd. in Singapore.

First Bear Market
“In the West, there are still those who remember what happened in 1987 and even 1974,” Toovey says of earlier Wall Street plunges. “But this is the first generation of investors to have experienced a bear market in China in conjunction with a serious slowdown in global growth.”
Some of Huang’s fellow billionaires have also had precipitous falls.
Citic Pacific Ltd., run by Larry Yung, lost as much as $2.4 billion last year by betting wrong on the Australian dollar.
The company was bailed out by the Chinese government and now faces an unspecified investigation by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, according to a statement released by the stock market regulator.
Under the 2003 Securities and Futures Ordinance, making a false and misleading statement can result in a prison sentence, according to a government Web site.

Jailed for 18 Years
On the mainland, Zhang Wenzhong, founder of Hong Kong- listed Wumart Stores Inc., was sentenced to 18 years in prison in October for bribery, embezzlement and fraud, according to the Web site of the Chinese Supreme People’s Court.
Scandal-free entrepreneurs are suffering, too, as their fortunes evaporate along with a weakening economy.
Li Ning, the former gymnastics gold medalist who lit the Olympic flame, Spider-Man style, at the 2008 Beijing games, has watched a plunge in shares of his sporting goods retailer whittle his wealth by almost two-thirds since October 2007.
The stock price has plummeted more than 90 percent at the company owned by Zhang Yin, who became a billionaire recycling used paper into cardboard boxes to pack China’s exports.
“Like Warren Buffett says, when the tide goes out, you find out who’s swimming naked,” says David Webb, a Hong Kong-based investor, shareholder activist and publisher of Webb-site.com.
It’s been more than 30 years since Deng Xiaoping cast off communist orthodoxy and told his countrymen, “To get rich is glorious.” 
Since then, the country has become fascinated with the newly wealthy class created as the country’s economy boomed.

415,000 Millionaires
Last year, China had 415,000 millionaires, according to a Merrill Lynch & Co./Capgemini report. The country also has more than 100 billionaires, says Rupert Hoogewerf, CEO of Hurun Inc., a research firm that tracks China’s new rich.
That was all right with China’s leadership, which subscribed to a form of trickledown economics. “Deng’s view was that some people would get rich first and the momentum would pull along the rest,” says Laurence Brahm, an American author and investor who owns hotels and restaurants in China.
In the 1980s, those waiting to be swept up by that wave envied the wanyuan hu, households with savings of 10,000 yuan -- about $3,500 at the time. By the end of the next decade, newspaper and magazine readers were poring over rich lists of multimillionaires.
So were the authorities, who were on the lookout for those who failed to pay taxes or obtained their wealth as a result of some blatant criminal activity.
The rich lists became wanted lists, Brahm says. 
Some of China’s wealthiest went to jail. They included Yang Bin, 43, a Dutch-educated orchid and tulip entrepreneur with a fortune of $940 million, who was imprisoned for 18 years in 2003 for defrauding shareholders in his Hong Kong-listed company, Euro-Asia Agricultural (Holdings) Co., by inflating profits. 
Others were murdered by business rivals or committed suicide to avoid public embarrassment.

Scaring the Monkey
While to get rich remained glorious, those who became too wealthy were sometimes made into scapegoats, especially in a country where some 200 million people still subsist on just $1.25 a day. 
“There’s a Chinese saying that you kill the chicken to scare the monkey,” Brahm says.
Even businessmen the government once lauded can wind up in jail. “China’s reforms are full of contradictions and juxtapositions,” he says.
China isn’t retreating from capitalism, says Tao Dong, Hong Kong-based chief regional economist at Credit Suisse Group AG. 
“There’s no new policy targeting the private sector,” he says.

Private Companies’ Role
In fact, China will have to rely heavily on private companies to boost its economy. 
“The good entrepreneurs are symbols of the success of 30 years of reform,” says Christian Jiang Weisong, a Hong Kong-based analyst at Bocom International Holdings, a unit of Bank of Communications Ltd. The bank, China’s fifth-largest lender, is 20 percent owned by HSBC Holdings Plc. “It’s important for China that they don’t fail,” he says.
The role of entrepreneurs in the economy is more than symbolic. 
Private companies accounted for 70 percent of the country’s gross domestic product last year compared with 17 percent in 1990, according to CLSA Ltd., the Asian investment banking arm of France’s Credit Agricole SA.
Entrepreneurs have also created 50 million jobs in the past decade, according to Liu Yang, who helps manage $2 billion in Hong Kong for London-based Atlantis Investment Management. That’s more than the 46 million who were fired when China began closing its inefficient state-owned enterprises in the late 1990s.

Party’s Firm Grip
Entrepreneurs still have to navigate a hybrid economic system. 
The Communist Party retains a firm grip on the world’s third-largest economy. Many companies have a party secretary serving on their board of directors, and all but one of China’s 130 banks are still government controlled.
“When times get tough, those state-owned banks lend to the state-owned enterprises and not to the entrepreneurs,” says Chris Ruffle, who helps manage $14 billion at Edinburgh-based Martin Currie Investments Ltd.’s China unit in Shanghai.
The red capitalists are also vulnerable when their political connections -- known as guanxi -- change because leaders retire, are transferred to other jobs or are purged.
“Entrepreneurs have to constantly watch the political winds and waves,” says Albert Louie, founder of Beijing-based risk consulting firm A. Louie Associates Corp.
The departure in 2007 of high-profile Commerce Minister Bo Xilai, who moved out of Beijing to become party chief of Chongqing municipality in Southwest China, may have contributed to the downfall of Gome’s Huang, Louie says.

‘Political Wrangling’
“Huang was an obvious target and a victim of political wrangling,” he says. “Without the support of people in the Commerce Ministry, he couldn’t have gotten so far so fast.”
Even the government acknowledges the importance of guanxi. 
“Most entrepreneurs fail because of the country’s political/business relationships,” said a January editorial in Xiaokang/Caizhi magazine, which is owned by the Central Committee of the Communist Party. 
“While this enmeshment between politics and business in China has allowed a whole group of entrepreneurs to rise, it has also hindered their progress and may lead to potentially explosive consequences.”
Few have used guanxi better than suave, silver-haired Yung, chairman of Citic Pacific. Yung, 66, is the son of a former vice president of China and grandson of Rong Desheng, who made his fortune in freewheeling prewar Shanghai.

Citic’s History
When most tycoons, including members of the Rong clan, fled abroad before Mao Zedong’s 1949 communist revolution, Yung’s father, Rong Yiren, stayed and handed the family’s mainland businesses over to the state.
After China embraced free markets, Rong Yiren was rewarded in 1979 with the task of setting up China’s first state-owned investment corporation, today known as Citic Group.
Rong was appointed vice president of China in 1993. When Citic set up a publicly traded unit in Hong Kong in 1990, Rong’s son, Yung (Yung is the Cantonese pronunciation of the Mandarin Rong) was named chairman.
Yung lived the capitalist lifestyle: He raced horses and became a steward of the Hong Kong Jockey Club. He bought a U.K. estate, once the home of former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, where he built a private golf course and hunted.
“Yung demonstrated a lifestyle that’s compatible with Hong Kong and was a tremendous force for confidence,” Brahm says.
Not anymore. 
In October, Yung disclosed to investors in a statement that Citic Pacific could lose up to $2.4 billion -- the equivalent of its combined 2006 and ’07 profit -- from betting that the Australian dollar, one of the world’s more volatile currencies, would rise against the U.S. dollar.

‘I Kill You Laters’
In July, when the Australian dollar was trading near a 25- year high against the U.S. currency, Citic Pacific bet it would continue to rise.
Using derivatives contracts known as accumulators, the company wanted to minimize its currency exposure resulting from a A$1.6 billion (US$1.07 billion) investment in an iron ore mine in Australia. 
Three months later, the Aussie had lost almost 40 percent of its value against the greenback, and Citic Pacific’s losses from the accumulators -- so notorious in Hong Kong that investors refer to them as “I kill you laters” -- had soared.
The currency loss would be the biggest ever by a Chinese company, about four times the $550 million loss China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. incurred on jet fuel trades in 2004. 
Yung fired financial director Leslie Chang, 54, and financial controller Chau Chi Yin, 52, because they made the contracts without proper authorization, Yung said in a statement in October.

Demoted
Yung’s daughter, Frances, 36, who was described in Citic Pacific’s 2007 annual report as director, group finance, escaped the ax because, according to the company, she was less culpable and reported to Chang. 
Frances Yung was demoted and will take a pay cut, the company said.
Citic Pacific’s shares plunged to 8.68 Hong Kong dollars on Feb. 23, down 79% from a year earlier.
Yung’s connections helped save Citic Pacific, which makes steel and develops property. He flew to Beijing to persuade the company’s state-owned parent to cover the losses in exchange for convertible bonds. 
Ratings agencies in February upgraded Citic Pacific debt because they said the deal showed the strength of support the company has from Citic Group, which now owns 57.6 percent of its Hong Kong unit.

Yung’s Stake Plunges
Yung, who owned 19% of the company, lost more than a third of his stake when Citic Group converted the bonds to stock. 
Other investors include Montreal-based Power Corp., which owns 4.35 percent of Citic Pacific, according to Bloomberg data. Andre Desmarais, a member of the billionaire family that controls Power Corp. and a Citic Pacific director, declined to comment on the losses. Yung and other directors also declined to comment.
Albert Ho, chairman of Hong Kong’s opposition Democratic Party, says he wants to know why Yung and his fellow directors waited six weeks before disclosing the losses.
Citic said in October that the company learned of the losses on Sept. 7 -- five days before it issued a circular announcing a connected transaction that said “directors are not aware of any material adverse change in the financial or trading position of the group since 31 Dec. 2007.”
Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission said on Oct. 22 that it’s investigating the company. 
Citic Pacific directors including Managing Director Henry Fan, Yung and his son Carl, 39, the company’s deputy managing director, are being investigated as part of that probe, the company said in January.

Criminal Penalty
The Securities and Futures Ordinance allows civil or criminal action against anyone for market misconduct. The maximum penalty is 10 years in prison and a fine of HK$10 million (US$1.29 million).
Fan, 60, and other directors declined to be interviewed pending the result of the inquiry, Fan said in an e-mail to Bloomberg News. SFC spokesman Ernest Kong declined to comment.
Though she has political connections, Zhang Yin, who founded Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd., has no state-owned parent to bail her out.
The daughter of an army lieutenant who quit the military to become general manager of a metallurgical company in Guangdong province, Zhang, 51, started a scrap paper business in the 1970s with $3,800 in capital.
In 1990, she moved to Los Angeles, where she ran a paper collection company out of her apartment. 
After moving back to China, Zhang and her husband, Liu Ming Chung, set up Nine Dragons. Business boomed as China’s exports soared, increasing demand for cardboard boxes to pack toys, shoes and computers that the country was selling abroad.

Tax Cuts for Rich?
Zhang and her husband made $400 million selling a 30% stake in Nine Dragons on the Hong Kong stock exchange in 2006. 
By September of that year, Zhang’s shares were valued at $10 billion, making her China’s richest person, according to Hurun.
Zhang’s success also earned her a seat on the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, an advisory body to the Chinese government. 
There, Zhang was criticized by fellow conference members for proposing tax cuts for the rich and amendments to a new labor contract law that increases benefits for workers, the official news agency, Xinhua, reported in March 2008. 
Zhang sought an exemption for labor-intensive industries such as her own. 
“By opposing China’s new labor laws so conspicuously, she has made enemies, and that has hurt her business,” Louie says.

Fewer Boxes Used
China’s slowing export growth didn’t help either. 
Zhang’s customers began using fewer of her company’s boxes. Thousands of factories closed last year, including 4,000 toymakers.
In December, Nine Dragons issued a statement denying Chinese media reports that it was facing bankruptcy. 
“Our position remains healthy,” Zhang said at the time. 
On Feb. 9, Nine Dragons said it plans to buy back $284 million worth of five-year notes at a discount of at least 47 percent to face value. 
Investors who accept the offer for the notes, which were issued less than 10 months ago, will get back only 53 cents on the dollar plus interest.
On Feb. 18, the company said profit fell 69 percent in the six months ended Dec. 31 from a year earlier. 
In a statement, Zhang said the global financial crisis and fluctuating raw material prices had resulted in “unprecedented challenges and difficulties.” 
On Feb 23, the share price had fallen 91 percent from its peak in Sept. 2007 to HK$2.38. That leaves Zhang, once worth $10 billion, with a fortune of less than $1 billion.

Real Estate Slump
Real estate developer Yang Huiyan, 28, also found her paper billions evaporating as the market shifted. 
In April 2007, investors bought shares valued at $1.9 billion in Yang’s Country Garden Holdings Co., a property developer based in Guangdong province, where home sales had grown at the rate of 22% annually for a decade. 
Within five months, Yang’s 60 percent stake in Country Garden was valued at $16.2 billion. Then, China’s property bubble burst. By Feb. 23, Country Garden stock had plunged 88 percent to HK$1.60.
Some entrepreneurs stand to lose more than just a paper fortune. 
On the windswept grasslands of Inner Mongolia, far from the boom-and-bust property markets of China’s great cities, Niu Gensheng made his fortune betting that China’s population would acquire the Western taste for milk and dairy products.
In September, Niu, 50, lost a chunk of his wealth when the Chinese government disclosed that 22 dairy companies, including Niu’s, had been selling products containing melamine, an industrial chemical that can boost the protein levels of watered-down milk.

Babies Killed
At least six babies died and 294,000 suffered kidney ailments and urinary problems after drinking infant formula tainted with melamine, the Ministry of Health said in a series of statements from October through January.
In 1999, Niu founded China Mengniu Dairy Co., now the biggest player in the country’s dairy industry, which had $20 billion of sales in 2007. 
In June ’04, he sold $200 million of stock on the Hong Kong exchange. As the price surged sixfold by the end of ’07, Niu became a billionaire.
He sponsored China’s first astronaut and the Chinese version of the American Idol TV show, as well as giving away $92 million to charities, making him China’s fourth-biggest philanthropist, according to Hurun.

Melamine Found
He was not so successful in ensuring that all of the milk he bought from independent suppliers was of high quality. 
On Sept. 23, China’s General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine said that melamine had been found in infant formula made by Mengniu and 21 other companies.
That day, shares in Niu’s company plunged 60 percent. 
On Feb. 23, the shares were trading at HK$9.88, down 72 percent from their September 2007 peak. In December, the company said it expected to post a $121 million loss for 2008 compared with a $136 million profit a year earlier. 
Niu cut his 990,000 yuan ($145,000) salary in half to atone for the error.
On Jan. 16, lawyers for 213 families filed lawsuits against Mengniu and the other companies. 
Six days later, China sentenced two men to death for their involvement and gave a life sentence to another company chief. 
Chinese media have not reported any charges against Niu or other Mengniu executives. Niu declined to be interviewed for this article.
At least Niu still has his freedom -- unlike Huang, the imprisoned founder of appliance retailer Gome. 
In January, Huang resigned from Gome’s board, according to Greaves and Gome spokesman Tim Payne. Huang’s wife, Du, 38, who’s under house arrest, resigned in December.

Gome’s Rise
Huang and Du, a former employee of Bank of China Ltd., built Gome into a national chain selling everything from flat-screen televisions to rice cookers.
To bring international experience to the board, Huang recruited Chang Sun, who runs the China business of New York-based Warburg Pincus, which owns about 1 percent of Gome stock; American Tom Manning, a former Bain & Co. managing director; and Greaves of Hanson Capital.
As they prospered, Huang and Du embraced some of the trappings of wealth. 
Though his teeth were nicotine stained from chain-smoking, Huang dressed in well-tailored striped shirts and suits and owned a BMW 6 Series car, while Du wore Dior. 
With their three children, they moved into a 300-square-meter (3,200- square-foot) condominium in a development owned by Huang’s real estate company.

Share Manipulation Suspected
After Huang disappeared, Xinhua reported that he was suspected of having manipulated trading in shares of two other companies, Beijing Centergate Technologies (Holding) Co. and Sanlian Commercial Co.
Xinhua also reported in January that two investigators from China’s public security ministry had been detained for allegedly taking bribes during the investigation into Huang.
Other than that, Chinese authorities have released no details of the allegations against him.
Alarmed that Gome could collapse without its founders, the remaining directors set up an action committee headed by Sun. 
They also called in a forensic auditing team from Ernst & Young LLP to investigate any irregular transactions.
Greaves says nothing has been found so far. 
“When people do get taken in for questioning, they sometimes disappear for months or even years,” Greaves says. “That creates uncertainty, which is the worst thing for institutional shareholders, especially when the rest of their world is crumbling around them.”

Private Equity Talks
The company has appointed a new chairman to replace Huang, and begun preliminary talks about selling a stake in the company to private equity funds, according to Greaves and a Hong Kong-based company spokesman, Tim Payne. 
As much as 20 percent of the company is up for grabs, people familiar with the plan told Bloomberg News.
Greaves says he believes Gome can be saved, and outsiders agree. 
“The word we are hearing from Beijing is that even if they take out the individual, the company will be allowed to survive,” says Steve Vickers, CEO of International Risk Ltd., a Hong Kong-based unit of FTI Consulting Inc. of West Palm Beach, Florida.
The outlook for Huang himself is bleaker. 
“The chances of Huang Guangyu coming out of captivity are pretty small,” Xiaokang/Caizhi, the party central committee magazine, wrote in its January issue. 
As the new rich become the newly poor in China’s seesawing economy, the one thing that seems constant is the power of the state.